Pennsylvania –The Year of The Rat Unfolds, Part 2

American author E.B. White once said, “The rat had no morals, no conscience, no scruples, no consideration, no decency, no milk of rodent kindness, no compunctions, no higher feeling, no friendliness, no anything”. How befitting a description it is when considering the rats that have infested the American election process.

The Pennsylvania State Legislature public hearing follows Rudy Giuliani’s opening remarks with a 15-minute segment consisting of 4 volunteers during the 2020 election process. Each bore witness to their firsthand accounts, describing what they saw as “problematic, to say the least”.

If you don’t have time to listen to the whole hearing, we will sum it up for you in easy-to-understand segments with info-graphics.

Witness Testimonials – First 15-minute Segment

Justin Kwederi
– Volunteer Certified GOP Canvas Observer

“I can tell you that I am an eyewitness to many issues and irregularities that were observed in Philadelphia. With the processing and counting of the vote, I was a witness to too many issues and irregularities to cover in a brief opening statement, and as such, I will now focus on just two issues that I did personally observe:

The Philadelphia Board of Elections processed hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots with zero civilian oversight or observation… We were arranged at a distance from the observers of about 10 feet to more than 200 feet away from us.”

“The pink highlighter (ballots) could not be read by the scanners. They all had to be done again—all of the duplicated mail-in ballots had to be fixed, and the Philadelphia Board of Elections’ solution to this problem was to give the workers who were working alone individually stacks of hundreds, of what amounted to blank mail-in ballots.”

Kim Peterson
– Canvasser (Republican Representative)

“I was led back to the area where we were able to view them opening the mail-in ballots. We were kept in a corral…”

Leah Hoops
– Poll Watcher

“There were multiple places to bring in ballots—in and out of elevators and many rooms in which workers had access. I was there for three straight days. What became of concern was the back room, which had no observers, no line of sight or transparency into the process. There was no cooperation—complete resistance… from election night and every day after. It took until our lawyer got an injunction to get into that back room, in which pre-canvassing was transpiring even with an injunction, which was a joke.”

Gregory Stensrtom
– GOP Poll Watcher

“I think it’s impossible to verify the validity of about 100,000 to 120,000 votes.

I saw there was a chain of custody in all cases that was broken—it was broken for the mail-in ballots, the dropbox ballots, the election day USBV card flash drives. In all cases, the chain of custody and the procedures that were defined by The Delaware County Board of Elections in election process review were all… they didn’t follow one. I personally observed …”

“The gentleman that came in with me is a Democrat poll watcher—is a forensic pathologist, a very detailed, very dedicated man, and he took meticulous notes as well. And I verified with him, “Are you seeing what I’m seeing?”. We both agreed as GOP poll watchers, and a Democrat poll watcher, that we had witnessed 60 to 70 thousand.”

Pennsylvania-State-Legislature-Holds-Part2-5

Downloadable PDF:

Hearing Transcripts in PDF (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSDZkXxFVEU):

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *